Always happy to hear from you.
If you have anything you'd like to tell me, or if you have any questions about my books, please send me a message and I will reply as quickly as I can. I am also very willing to give any advice to aspiring authors, but simply because of time restraints it's often difficult to read any material you might send. I look forward to hearing from you. R.J. ELLORY

Why America?

The question I am most asked (aside from ‘Where do you get your ideas from?’, which I always feel should actually be ‘Why do you have these ideas?), is ‘Why does an Englishman write crime books set in the USA?’

I don’t think there’s any one single, simple answer (is there ever, for anything?), but to give you some kind of an idea of how this all came about, I sort of have to go the long way about explaining it.

Paul Auster said something very interesting one time. He said that said that becoming a writer was not a ‘career decision’ like becoming a doctor or a policeman. You don’t choose it so much as get chosen, and once you accepted the fact that you were not fit for anything else, you had to be prepared to walk a long, hard road for the rest of your days. I also believe that you don’t so much choose your genre or subject mater, it kind of chooses you. I think the very worst kind of book you could write is the book that you think others will enjoy. I think the best kind of book to write is the one you believe you yourself would enjoy reading. I think the genre you write in has to relate to your own interests and passions. Writing a book can take a while, and if you’re not interested in what you’re writing about, then that’s going to make the job so much harder, perhaps even impossible.

I think I was weaned out of infancy on American culture. I grew up watching Starsky and Hutch, Hawaii Five-O, Kojak, all those kinds of things. I loved the atmosphere, the diversity of culture. The politics fascinated me. America is a new country compared to England, and it just seems to me that there was so much colour and life inherent in its society. I have visited a good number of times, and I honestly feel like I’m going home in a strange kind of way, a bit like ‘deja vu’, if you know what I mean.  And I believe that as a non-American there are many things about American culture that I can look at as a spectator. The difficulty with writing about an area that you are very familiar with is that you tend to stop noticing things. You take things for granted. The odd or interesting things about the people and the area cease to be odd and interesting. As an outsider you never lose that viewpoint of seeing things for the first time, and for me that is very important. Also many writers are told to write about the things with which they are familiar. I don’t think this is wrong, but I think it is very limiting. I believe you should also write about the things that fascinate you. I think in that way you have a chance to let your passion and enthusiasm for the subject come through in your prose. I also believe that you should challenge yourself with each new book. Take on different and varied subjects. Do not allow yourself to fall into the trap of writing things to a formula. Someone once said to me that there were two types of novels. There were those that you read simply because some mystery was created and you had to find out what happened. The second kind of novel was one where you read the book simply for the language itself, the way the author used words, the atmosphere and description. The truly great books are the ones that accomplish both. I think any author wants to write great novels. I don’t think anyone – in their heart of hearts – writes because it’s a sensible choice of profession, or for financial gain. I just love to write, and though the subject matter that I want to write about takes me to the States, it is nevertheless more important to me to write something that can move someone emotionally, perhaps change a view about life, and at the same time to try and write it as beautifully as I can. I also want to write about subjects – whether they be political conspiracies, serial killings, race relations, political assassinations or FBI and CIA investigations – that could only work in the USA. The kind of novels I want to write just wouldn’t work in small, green, leafy villages where you find Hobbits!

With me, the most important thing about any novel is the emotion it evokes. The reason for writing about the subjects I do is simply that such subjects give me the greatest opportunity to write about real people and how they deal with real situations. There is nothing in life more interesting than people, and one of the most interesting aspects of people is their ability to overcome difficulty and survive. I think I write ‘human dramas’, and in those dramas I feel I have sufficient canvas to paint the whole spectrum of human emotions, and this is what captures my attention. I once heard that non-fiction possesses, as its primary purpose, the conveying of information, whereas fiction possessed the primary purpose of evoking an emotion in the reader. I love writers that make me feel something – an emotion, whatever it might be – but I want to feel something as I read the book. There are millions of great books out there, all of them written very well, but they are mechanical in their plotting and style. Three weeks after reading them you might not recall anything about them. That is not meant as a criticism, because that degree of clever plotting takes a great intellect, and is probably something I just could not do well.  However, the books that really get me are the ones I remember months later. I might not recall the names of the characters or the intricacies of the plot, but I remember how it made me feel. For me, that’s all important. The emotional connection. So back to the setting and literary style. ‘A Quiet Belief In Angels’, for example, has been described as ‘Steinbeck-esque’. The setting and the literary style were certainly not meant to be evocative of Steinbeck. I have to be completely honest and tell you that prior to writing ‘A Quiet Belief In Angels’ I had read only ‘Cannery Row’. I have cited Steinbeck as an inspiration, also Hemingway, Carson McCullers, Harper Lee, Willa Cather, but it is only now that I am beginning to read more of their work. As with all my novels the style in which I write is based on the subject matter. Other novels – ‘A Quiet Vendetta’, ‘City of Lies’, ‘The Anniversary Man’ – are actually written in a far more economical and punchy style. The style came with the setting, the style came with the voice, and there was never any intention to write like another author.

I have done, and still do, a tremendous amount of research. It was always very, very important to me to ensure that everything mentioned in the book was genuine and correct as far as the time and place were concerned. It can be quite a task. There is an old adage as far as writing is concerned – ‘Wear your learning lightly’ – meaning that you cannot bury your fictional work beneath a ton of facts. I had to be careful of that too; to make sure that the history and the cultural aspects necessary to give a sincere reflection of the time and place weren’t so overwhelming that the story beneath was lost. Some facts were hard to find, others somewhat easier, but still the responsibility lies with the author to make his or her work as sincere and genuine as possible. You can read about places – about cities and towns and areas. You can study guide books, maps, photos on the internet, but any description of a place is the author’s ‘take’ on that place. Readers are not necessarily looking for anything that will agree with their perspective on a location; they are looking for something that evokes an atmosphere. The first sentence of ‘A Quiet Vendetta’ is eighty-seven words long and has no full stop at the end. It’s about New Orleans. People from New Orleans write to me. They don’t say ‘Hey, you don’t live here…you can’t write this!’ They say, ‘That’s what New Orleans feels like to me as well!’ It’s about evoking an atmosphere, not agreeing with everyone else’s viewpoint of a place. Does that make sense?

And I believe that evoking an atmosphere is all-important.  I can’t remember who it was, but I believe it was a Russian writer who said something along the lines of, ‘Spend a day in a city, you’ll write a novel; spend a month, you’ll write a chapter; spend a year, you’ll write a page.’  I understand that viewpoint.  I would really struggle to write a novel set in my home city.  It’s too familiar.  I’m too close to it all.  A good friend of mine, David Peace, said he could never have written the Red Riding novels while still living in the UK.  He wrote them whole he was living in Japan.  He needed distance.  He needed objectivity.

Anyway, more than anything else it’s about people. Readers will forgive you anything if you engage them, and the way to engage readers is with your characters.

The thing that fascinates me is people. Doesn’t matter who they are or what they do, the important thing is people. The thing that never ceases to amaze me is the indomitability of the human spirit, the things that people are capable of overcoming, and the fact that they can then survive beyond that. For me, writing ‘crime thrillers’ or ‘mysteries’ is not so much about the crime itself, even the investigation, but the way in which such events can be used to highlight and illuminate the way that people deal with things that are not usual. If there is one common thread throughout my books, though they are all very different stories, it is that we are always dealing with an ordinary person thrown into an extraordinary situation. That’s the common theme. That’s the thing that fascinates me. I suppose I am a romantic at heart, and I try very hard to be in touch with the emotional nature of people and things, and what I am always striving to do is have a reader feel what the characters are feeling, to get an idea that they have spent some time with real people, and to bring about the sense that they were aware of what was going on with that character on many levels. That, for me, seems key to making a book memorable.

8 Responses to Why America?

  • Un heureux hasard : un livre déposé dans l'hôtel où je séjournai en septembre 2011 (SEUL LE SILENCE) et je suis entrée  très vite dans l'histoire, la vivant au plus fort. Puis VENDETTA et maintenant les ANONYMES. Lire vos livres, c'est entrer dans le monde et la vie de quelques personnes et ressentir leur âme. 

    La longueur de vos livres fait que nous faisons davantage connaissance … et accompagnons vos personnages, hommes ou femmes.

    Vous avez tout dit dans votre article (même si la traduction google est moyenne) 

    Je vous dis merci.

     

    • Je suis desolee, Gabriel, mais je ne parle Francais! Merci beaucoup pour vos mots tres gentile.  I am very happy that you have enjoyed the books, and I hope you continue to read them.

  • The adivice to 'write what you know' is massively flawed in my view, and as you say Roger, limiting. For me, writing is an exploration, a voyage of discovery: back into history maybe, and some self-discovery, well a lot of self-discovery. It's an exploration of other world, both internal and external.

    • I know that you and I have many similar views on writing, primarily from your work, of course, but also from the brief conversations we have had.  I have to say, however, that what is right for one is not right for another, and some writers write brilliantly about their own zones of experience.  It takes all sorts to fill a library! 

  • Roger,
    Now I never have to ask that question. Thank you!
    Arnie:)

  • Roger

    In all your objectives above, you have achieved each and every one. And then some. With knobs on.

    As I have told other people, mainly friends, sometimes acquaintances, you have inspired me to want to become a writer. I wrote to you a few years ago after discovering AQBIA (through the wonderful R&J Book Club) and you took the time to reply about how you had the idea for the book when visiting a sick friend. I think you wrote about a thousand words in your reply and this spoke volumes about your passion and respect for your readers. You also did an online interview for me which, unfortunately, did not get published. I just want people to read your work and I will endeavour to tell all and sundry about your unique and powerful storytelling.

    I do lack your tenacity – unpublished so far – but I have inherited your passion for the written word and I do it because I want people to read my words and feel something; hopefully something powerful and evocative. Just as you have done and, hopefully, continue to do.

    By the way, I believe my friend is a mutual friend of David Peace. His name is Robert Maclaren and he is the most wonderful person you could wish to meet. David obviously makes good choices for friends!

    Anyway, proud to have you as a FB friend too.

    With the warmest regards,

    Paul.

    • Proud to have you as a friend too, Paul, and – in truth – so much of what passes for ‘talent’ is just a phenomenal amount of practice.  Even Hemingway said something along the lines of  ‘Never let them know that you had to learn this craft; let them think you were born this way’.  So my advice to you was, is, and forever shall be that you should just continue.  You can write, and write well, and perseverence is so much of the battle of getting published.

      And yes, David Peace is a good friend of mine.  A great writer, and a wonderful man.

      Great to hear from you, as always, and thank you so very much for your wonderfully kind words.  Means a great deal to me.

      R.

Leave a Reply

Three Days in Chicagoland Trailer
My Old Blog
For years and years I have been blogging away, before I constructed this site. Please feel free to check out the archive by clicking here